The Darling is not my favorite of Banks's novels. It's not bad, it doesn't cause me to question the hyperbolic statements of the paragraph above. If anything, the faint disappointment I felt while reading it reinforced my appreciation for Banks's other books. Furthermore, while trying to determine what exactly I found disappointing about the book, I came across all sorts of things Banks does surprisingly well. For instance, he pulls off the trick of narrating in the voice of a person of the opposite sex, something many novelists really can't do. There's just something a little bit off in how the story is doled out -- it feels stingy, somehow -- he teases out the outline of the plot in the first 20 pages, then spends something like 400 more building up to a climactic few pages. It may have been a mistake to have read this book immediately after What Is the What: that book covered almost the same ground as The Darling (same continent, different country, different region, similar ideology), but in a much more immediate, personal way. Usually, Banks is an author who can marry ethical and political concerns with real narrative urgency, and in this book -- and really, maybe just in comparison to What Is the What -- he feels a little removed.
Comments